Faqja Kryesore
Rreth nesh
Aktivitete
Prokurime
Info & Lajme
Publikime
Rreth Shqipërisë
Kontakt
Prokurime
Faqja Kryesore > Prokurime > Punime Civile

Employer: Albanian Development Fund (ADF)


Project: Community Works IV: Development of the Albanian Alps and Coastal Areas


Contract title: “Reconstruction of road segment “Vlora Port – Soda Forest" – 2.3km”


Country: Albania


Loan No.: ALB - LD 1853


RFB No: CWPIV/W/OP/2016/4


Issued on: April 21, 2017


I. The duration and summary scope of the contract: The construction period is 18 months. The Works consist on landscape and urban regeneration and upgrading works within the city of Vlora. This contract is part of a strategy within the city which aims to activate the city life and have an impact on tourism also. The design envisages the road light along the main road and parking. Required works are mainly earthworks, concrete works, asphalt works, greenery work, and urban lighting.
The project consists in the reconstruction of Sazani road from the Port of Vlora to Pylli i Sodes for 2.3 km including asphalt lane plus bus station, 2 lane of footway and one lane for bicycle.


II. The selection method used: The Most Advantageous Bid.


III. The Bidder submitting the successful Bid: “ARIFAJ” shpk. Adr. Rr. "Urani Pano", Ap. C-07, Kati 6, H. 10, Tiranë.


IV. The Contract price of the successful Bid: 275,044,821 ALL (net of VAT) – 330,053786 ALL (VAT included).


V. The Bidders who submitted a Bid:

1) “Gener 2” shpk
2) “ARIFAJ” shpk
3) “Curri” shpk
4) JV “Shkëlqim 07” ltd & “SMO Union” ltd & “Consorzio Stabile EBG”
5) “GPG Company” shpk
6) “Geci” shpk
7) "Eurokos NTP" shpk
8) JV “Riviera”shpk & “Bitupave”
9) “Gjikuria” shpk


VI. The bid prices as read out at opening of financial parts of bids:
1) “ARIFAJ” shpk - 275,044,821 ALL (net of VAT) – 330,053786 ALL (VAT included).


VII. The bid prices as evaluated:
1) “ARIFAJ” shpk - 275,044,821 ALL (net of VAT) – 330,053786 ALL (VAT included).


VIII. The unsuccessful bidders and the reasons the bids were unsuccessful:


1) “Gener 2” shpk
The bid does not meet the qualifying criteria, conforming to all the terms, conditions and specifications of the Bidding Documents as follows:

4.2.a) Specific Construction Experience. The criterion is not fulfilled.
The bidder has submitted three work contracts for road infrastructure under Specific Construction requirement:

1. Reconstruction of “Road Boge Qafe Thore” with value of 438,676,996 ALL executed between 03/2013 – 2015. The construction consists in 2,139 m3 of concrete works, 13,447 tons of asphalt layers, and 50,607 m3 excavations.

2. “Construction of By Pass lot 8” with value of 874,510,350 ALL executed between 08/2011 – 2014. The construction consists in 143,968 m3 of earthworks, 17,625 tons of asphalt layers and 7,327 m3 of concrete works.

3. “Construction of Arber`s Road” with value of 2,332,963,024 ALL executed between 05/2011 – 09/2013. In this contract the contractor has placed only 785 ton of asphalt from 12,000 tons estimated in the BoQ of this contract. Therefore the contract is completed without asphalt layers. These works are not similar with the proposed Work as the complexity, method and technology are not the same as in a paved road.

Therefore it is not considered as Specific Construction Experience

4.2.b) Specific Construction Experience. The criterion is not fulfilled.
The bidder fails to fulfill the sub-requirement for Rolled colored asphalt.

The bidder has declared 7,002 ton of colored asphalt supplied and placed under contract Fiber optic ATU project. These volumes are completed during placement of optic fibers in existing roads. The asphalt placed on the existing roads is actually normal asphalt. Furthermore, the volumes are only self-declared without being certified with IPC.


2)    “Curri” shpk
The bid does not meet the qualifying criteria, conforming to all the terms, conditions and specifications of the Bidding Documents as follows:
4.2.a) Specific Construction Experience. The criterion is not fulfilled.
The bidder has submitted three contracts under Specific Construction requirement:
1.   “Reconstruction of Libonik road” with value of 247,793,100 ALL VAT excluded, executed between 07/2013 – 2014.
2.   “Reconstruction of Dragobi Valbone road” with value of 668,273,178 ALL VAT excluded, executed between 06/2012 – 2015.
3.   “Reconstruction of Surrel road” with value of 220,034,971 ALL net of VAT, executed between 02/2015 – 2016. The total value of this work is smaller than the requirement value of 228,672,266 ALL (VAT Excl.)
4.2.b) Specific Construction Experience. The criterion is not fulfilled.
-     The Bidder fails to fulfill the sub-requirement for colored asphalt: It has placed only 3,162 tons of colored asphalt which is smaller than the requirement of 6,720 ton:
o    In the contract road “Dragobi Valbone” it is placed 1,897 tons of colored asphalt.
o    In the contract “Libonik road” it is placed 1,265 tons of colored asphalt.
-     The Bidder fails to fulfill the sub-requirement for hydraulic mulch grass: it has planted 13,855 m2 of hydraulic mulch grass which is smaller than the requirement of 132,480 m2:
o    In the contract road “Porcelan – Kinostudio” it is planted 5,205 m2.
o    In the contract “Dogane – Mbikalimi Kashar” it is planted 8,650 m2.
 
3)      JV “Shkëlqim 07” ltd & “SMO Union” ltd & “Consorzio Stabile EBG”
The bid is not substantially responsive, conforming to all the terms, conditions and specifications of the Bidding Documents as follows:
ITB 19.8. The Bid security it is not in the name of the JV that submits the Bid. It is only in the name of “Shkëlqim 07” ltd.
 
4)      “GPG Company” shpk
The bid is not substantially responsive and does not meet the qualifying criteria, conforming to all the terms, conditions and specifications of the Bidding Documents as follows:
ITB 19.3. The validity period of the Bid security (guarantee) is smaller than the required period. It is valid up to 26 January 2017.
4.2.b) Specific Construction Experience. The criterion is not fulfilled.
-     The Bidder fails to fulfill the sub-requirement for colored asphalt: It has not submitted documents to demonstrate the requested specific volumes.
-     The Bidder fails to fulfill the sub-requirement for of hydraulic mulch grass volume: it has planted 6,500 m2 as opposed to 132,480 m2 requested.
      The volumes of hydraulic mulch grass are executed in the contract “Lushnje – Berat” Lot 1.
For all the other declared volumes there are no IPC to calculate or prove the quantities.
 
5)      “Geci” shpk
The bid does not meet the qualifying criteria, conforming to all the terms, conditions and specifications of the Bidding Documents as follows:
4.2.a) Specific Construction Experience. The criterion is not fulfilled.
The bidder has submitted four work contracts for road infrastructure under Specific Construction requirement:
1.   Reconstruction of “Road Kukes Krume” with value of 1,683,133,764 ALL, VAT excluded, executed in 23/05/2011 - 16/04/2015.
2.   Additional contract of Road “Kukes – Krume” with a value of 299,223,905 ALL, VAT excluded, executed in 2013 – 2015.
3.   “Road Voskopoja” with value of 447,391,822 ALL executed in 12/2008 – 08/2011.  This contract is completed by 20% in the required period and the value of works executed in this period is smaller than the requirement value.
      Therefore it is not considered as Specific Construction Experience.
4.   “Construction of Dragobi - Valbone Road” with value of 453,285,360 ALL, VAT excluded, executed in 06/2009 – 09/2011. This contract is completed by 35% in the required period and the value of works executed in this period is smaller than the requirement value.
Therefore it is not considered as Specific Construction Experience.
4.2.b) Specific Construction Experience. The criterion is not fulfilled.
-     The Bidder fails to fulfill the sub-requirement for Rolled colored asphalt: It has not submitted documents to demonstrate the requested specific volumes.
-     The Bidder fails to fulfill the sub-requirement for Hydraulic mulch grass seeding: It has not submitted documents to demonstrate the requested specific volumes.
 
6)      "Eurokos NTP" shpk
The bid does not meet the qualifying criteria, conforming to all the terms, conditions and specifications of the Bidding Documents as follows:
4.2.b) Specific Construction Experience. The criterion is not fulfilled.
-     The Bidder fails to fulfill the sub-requirement for Rolled colored asphalt: He has declared 7.149 tons of colored asphalt all completed by “Eurokos” sh.p.k. in one contract “Reconstruction of road “Sllatine – Gjurgjigjice”. After the IPCs verification is evidenced that Eurokos shpk is partner of a JV with two other companies, with 73%. Therefore it has completed 5,218 ton as opposed to 6,720 tons requested.
-     The Bidder fails to fulfill the sub-requirement for Hydraulic mulch grass: He has declared 129,714 m2 all completed by “Eurokos” sh.p.k. in two contracts. After the IPCs verification is evidenced that he is partner of a JV in both these contracts:
o    Road “Magure – Shale – Klecke” is partner with 60.31 %.
o    “Reconstruction of road “Sllatine – Gjurgjigjice” is partner with 73%.
Therefore the total amount of hydraulic mulch grass executed on both contracts is 82,932 m2 as opposed to 132,480 m2 requested.
 
7)      JV “Riviera”shpk & “Bitupave”
The bid is not substantially responsive and does not meet the qualifying criteria, conforming to all the terms, conditions and specifications of the Bidding Documents:
1.2 Conflict of Interest. The criterion is not fulfilled.
The submission requirement is the Letter of Bid. In case of JV, each member must meet the requirement. “Bitupave” has not submitted the Letter of Bid.
1.3 Bank Eligibility. The criterion is not fulfilled.
The submission requirement is the Letter of Bid. In case of JV, each member must meet the requirement. “Bitupave” has not submitted the Letter of Bid.
3.1 Financial Capabilities. The criterion is not fulfilled.
“Bitupave” submitted a declaration for financial liabilities. The declaration is a photocopy. The Bidder failed to present clarifications requested by the Employer for this item.
4.2.b) Specific Construction Experience. The criterion is not fulfilled.
“Bitupave” has not submitted documents (evidence) to prove the declared volumes of specific works completed form. The Bidder failed to present clarifications requested by the Employer for this item.
 
8)      “Gjikuria” shpk
The bid is not substantially responsive and does not meet the qualifying criteria, conforming to all the terms, conditions and specifications of the Bidding Documents as follows:
ITB 19.1. The bidder has not submitted a Bid security.
4.2.b) Specific Construction Experience. The criterion is not fulfilled.
-   The Bidder fails to fulfill the sub-requirement for Rolled colored asphalt: it has placed 61 tons as opposed to 6,720 tons requested. The volumes are executed in the contract Rruga “Kanali i Cukes – Butrint”.
-   The Bidder fails to fulfill the sub-requirement for Hydraulic mulch grass seeding: it has planted 5,000 m2 as opposed to 132,480 m2 requested. The volumes are executed in the contract Reconstruction of road “Surrel – Qafe Priske”.


Shkarko: